How to Install MegaTunix on Ubuntu Linux (all versions)

[djandruczyk]

sweet, that did it (cstdlib), should have thought of that one myself.

glad to hear that fixes it, committed into cvs

[muckblit]

I see a little sed error, and end up with ld thinking an option (-lGL) is a lib name.

Sept 26, 2008 linux ubuntu hardy
libs all installed and updated
/config.h.in/1.21/Fri Sep 26 12:01:27 2008//

______

config.status: executing depfiles commands
sed: -e expression #1, char 24: unknown option to `s'
______

g++ -g -O2 -o megatunix 2d_table_editor.o 3d_vetable.o about_gui.o apicheck.o args.o comms.o comms_gui.o combo_loader.o conversions.o core_gui.o dashboard.o dataio.o datamgmt.o datalogging_gui.o debugging.o dep_loader.o dep_processor.o dispatcher.o fileio.o firmware.o gui_handlers.o helpers.o init.o interrogate.o keybinder.o keyparser.o listmgmt.o locking.o logviewer_core.o logviewer_events.o logviewer_gui.o lookuptables.o main.o menu_handlers.o memory_gui.o multi_expr_loader.o mode_select.o notifications.o offline.o post_process.o raweditor.o req_fuel.o rtv_map_loader.o rtv_processor.o runtime_gui.o runtime_sliders.o runtime_status.o runtime_text.o serialio.o stringmatch.o tabloader.o tag_loader.o threads.o thermistor.o timeout_handlers.o t-logger.o tuning_gui.o user_outputs.o vetable_gui.o vex_support.o visibility.o warmwizard_gui.o widgetmgmt.o winserialio.o xmlcomm.o -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic /usr/lib/libgtkglext-x11-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdkglext-x11-1.0.so -lGLU -lGL -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so ../mtxmatheval/.libs/libmtxmatheval.a -lfl ../mtxcommon/.libs/libmtxcommon.a ../widgets/.libs/libmtxgauge.a /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so -lm /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so /usr/lib/libcairo.so /usr/lib/libfreetype.so -lz -lfontconfig -lpng12 -lXrender -lX11 -lpixman-1 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lrt /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [megatunix] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bob/src/MegaTunix/src'

[djandruczyk]

I see a little sed error, and end up with ld thinking an option (-lGL) is a lib name.

Sept 26, 2008 linux ubuntu hardy
libs all installed and updated
/config.h.in/1.21/Fri Sep 26 12:01:27 2008//

______

config.status: executing depfiles commands
sed: -e expression #1, char 24: unknown option to `s'
______

g++ -g -O2 -o megatunix 2d_table_editor.o 3d_vetable.o about_gui.o apicheck.o args.o comms.o comms_gui.o combo_loader.o conversions.o core_gui.o dashboard.o dataio.o datamgmt.o datalogging_gui.o debugging.o dep_loader.o dep_processor.o dispatcher.o fileio.o firmware.o gui_handlers.o helpers.o init.o interrogate.o keybinder.o keyparser.o listmgmt.o locking.o logviewer_core.o logviewer_events.o logviewer_gui.o lookuptables.o main.o menu_handlers.o memory_gui.o multi_expr_loader.o mode_select.o notifications.o offline.o post_process.o raweditor.o req_fuel.o rtv_map_loader.o rtv_processor.o runtime_gui.o runtime_sliders.o runtime_status.o runtime_text.o serialio.o stringmatch.o tabloader.o tag_loader.o threads.o thermistor.o timeout_handlers.o t-logger.o tuning_gui.o user_outputs.o vetable_gui.o vex_support.o visibility.o warmwizard_gui.o widgetmgmt.o winserialio.o xmlcomm.o -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic /usr/lib/libgtkglext-x11-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdkglext-x11-1.0.so -lGLU -lGL -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so ../mtxmatheval/.libs/libmtxmatheval.a -lfl ../mtxcommon/.libs/libmtxcommon.a ../widgets/.libs/libmtxgauge.a /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so -lm /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so /usr/lib/libcairo.so /usr/lib/libfreetype.so -lz -lfontconfig -lpng12 -lXrender -lX11 -lpixman-1 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lrt /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [megatunix] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bob/src/MegaTunix/src'

Hmm interesting. you system didn't have the GL libs on it. use "sudo apt-get install libgl1-mesa-dev" and then retry the ./configure; make ; sudo make install for megatunix.

[muckblit]

apt-get said that I already have the newest of that mesa lib.

Could it be that the sed regex error causes the config to lose the lib? If you tell me what file to look in, I could have it echo everything that goes into that regex. If you don't I could grep some files.

[muckblit]

This is in config.status and it has an s/. Most likely $mf is empty to cause that s/ error but that can't be because "for mf" would not pass an empty $mf.

case $ac_file$ac_mode in
"depfiles":C) test x"$AMDEP_TRUE" != x"" || for mf in $CONFIG_FILES; do
# Strip MF so we end up with the name of the file.
mf=`echo "$mf" | sed -e 's/:.*$//'`

[djandruczyk]

This is in config.status and it has an s/. Most likely $mf is empty to cause that s/ error but that can't be because "for mf" would not pass an empty $mf.

case $ac_file$ac_mode in
"depfiles":C) test x"$AMDEP_TRUE" != x"" || for mf in $CONFIG_FILES; do
# Strip MF so we end up with the name of the file.
mf=`echo "$mf" | sed -e 's/:.*$//'`

That sed error doesn't appear to be it. (I'ts been in mtx for years and no one else has had issues).

The error is a link failure, which means libGL.so is missing or broken.
do this:

dpkg-query -S /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
dpkg-query -S /usr/lib/libGL.so

Do you run any proprietary graphics drivers? (i.e. do you have an nvidia or ATI video card and use their drivers?)
I have an nvidia on my main system, but my other test system doesn't and mtx compiles fine on both.

[muckblit]

Nvidia!

sudo dpkg-query -S /usr/lib/libGL.so
diversion by nvidia-glx-dev from: /usr/lib/libGL.so
diversion by nvidia-glx-dev to: /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.xlibmesa
libgl1-mesa-dev: /usr/lib/libGL.so

I went to a non-nvidia box and megatunix compiled on the first try. Thanks for everything!

-Bob

[djandruczyk]

Nvidia!

sudo dpkg-query -S /usr/lib/libGL.so
diversion by nvidia-glx-dev from: /usr/lib/libGL.so
diversion by nvidia-glx-dev to: /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.xlibmesa
libgl1-mesa-dev: /usr/lib/libGL.so

I went to a non-nvidia box and megatunix compiled on the first try. Thanks for everything!

-Bob

hmm strange I get slightly different results:

For my primary development box with a new nvidia card (ubuntu 8.04)

Code: Select all

dave@shrapnel:~$ dpkg-query  -S /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
diversion by nvidia-glx-new from: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
diversion by nvidia-glx-new to: /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa
libgl1-mesa-glx, nvidia-glx-new: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1

dave@shrapnel:~$ dpkg-query  -S /usr/lib/libGL.so
libgl1-mesa-dev: /usr/lib/libGL.so
dave@shrapnel:~$ 

For my backup box (laptop, ubuntu 8.04, intel graphics)

Code: Select all

dave@dave-laptop:~$ dpkg-query -S /usr/lib/libGL.so
libgl1-mesa-dev: /usr/lib/libGL.so
dave@dave-laptop:~$ dpkg-query -S /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
libgl1-mesa-glx: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1

I'm not too familiar with dpkg diversions, your best bet might be to consult google...

[AAFA]

Dave
Steps for Ubuntu was easier than Windoze!

Dave it worked just like every step said it would.

[FSG_PB_Patrick]

Hardy 8.04, worked on first try with that debian package file. THX

[partsguy22]

will I installed 'tunix on my old computer just fine (ubuntu 9.04) however I keep getting the following when i try on the laptop (ubuntu 9.10 64bit)


aaron@aaron-laptop:~$ sudo apt-get install libgtkglext1-dev g++ gcc flex bison glade-gnome-2 libglade2-dev make cvs gdb automake1.9
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
g++ is already the newest version.
g++ set to manually installed.
gcc is already the newest version.
libglade2-dev is already the newest version.
libglade2-dev set to manually installed.
make is already the newest version.
cvs is already the newest version.
gdb is already the newest version.
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
glade-gnome-2: Depends: glade-gnome (>= 2) but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages



I went into synaptics and installed glade-gnome but still get this error any ideas?

[djandruczyk]

will I installed 'tunix on my old computer just fine (ubuntu 9.04) however I keep getting the following when i try on the laptop (ubuntu 9.10 64bit)


aaron@aaron-laptop:~$ sudo apt-get install libgtkglext1-dev g++ gcc flex bison glade-gnome-2 libglade2-dev make cvs gdb automake1.9
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
g++ is already the newest version.
g++ set to manually installed.
gcc is already the newest version.
libglade2-dev is already the newest version.
libglade2-dev set to manually installed.
make is already the newest version.
cvs is already the newest version.
gdb is already the newest version.
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
glade-gnome-2: Depends: glade-gnome (>= 2) but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages



I went into synaptics and installed glade-gnome but still get this error any ideas?

try removing "glade-gnome-2" from the list and see if it completes and builds.

[partsguy22]

Thanks that did it ..I thought it would be something simple

and to get started tuning

[Locke]

I compiled and packaged MegaTunix 0.9.19-beta1 for i386 as a self-installing deb if anyone wants to use it.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1108539/debs/me ... 1_i386.deb

[pstrbrc]

OK, that is MAXIMUM cool. I've been away from MegaSquirt since I've converted 100% to Ubuntu (Actually Xubuntu 9.04) since the project bike is so buried in the garage and the project car was scrapped (nothing to do with the motor, just no time to finish an overwhelming chassis build) so now I get to pull the MS boxes back out and start again. I was kind of hesitant because of my change in os, but MegaTunix is sweet! Thanks.

[djandruczyk]

OK, that is MAXIMUM cool. I've been away from MegaSquirt since I've converted 100% to Ubuntu (Actually Xubuntu 9.04) since the project bike is so buried in the garage and the project car was scrapped (nothing to do with the motor, just no time to finish an overwhelming chassis build) so now I get to pull the MS boxes back out and start again. I was kind of hesitant because of my change in os, but MegaTunix is sweet! Thanks.

debs are available on the sourceforge site:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/megatunix/files

[pstrbrc]

OK, that is MAXIMUM cool. I've been away from MegaSquirt since I've converted 100% to Ubuntu (Actually Xubuntu 9.04) since the project bike is so buried in the garage and the project car was scrapped (nothing to do with the motor, just no time to finish an overwhelming chassis build) so now I get to pull the MS boxes back out and start again. I was kind of hesitant because of my change in os, but MegaTunix is sweet! Thanks.

debs are available on the sourceforge site:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/megatunix/files

The deb available provoked an "unsatisfied dependency" message. using the tarball was a piece of cake, and it runs right, my old v 2.2 ms1 communicates well though my usb/serial cable, so it's all good.

[djandruczyk]

The deb available provoked an "unsatisfied dependency" message. using the tarball was a piece of cake, and it runs right, my old v 2.2 ms1 communicates well though my usb/serial cable, so it's all good.

The deb on sourceforge, or the one provided by the other user? Which OS version are you running?

[pstrbrc]

The deb available provoked an "unsatisfied dependency" message. using the tarball was a piece of cake, and it runs right, my old v 2.2 ms1 communicates well though my usb/serial cable, so it's all good.

The deb on sourceforge, or the one provided by the other user? Which OS version are you running?

Oh, you're right. The one provided by the other user. So I don't know how your deb would work. Xubuntu 9.04. Your build instructions were certainly clear enough to use the source file, though.

[djandruczyk]

The deb available provoked an "unsatisfied dependency" message. using the tarball was a piece of cake, and it runs right, my old v 2.2 ms1 communicates well though my usb/serial cable, so it's all good.

The deb on sourceforge, or the one provided by the other user? Which OS version are you running?

Oh, you're right. The one provided by the other user. So I don't know how your deb would work. Xubuntu 9.04. Your build instructions were certainly clear enough to use the source file, though.

The one he made was probably against a newer release. the one i made on sourceforge is from 8.04 and i tested it on 8.04, 9.04 and 9.10