generic_pid_routine: P term not working?

[muythaibxr]

elaw, I specifically need a log of 1.4 PID doing "wonky things" (assuming you're talking about idle here) from you.

[elaw]

I posted a snippet, along with .msq etc. in this thread: http://www.msextra.com/forums/viewtopic ... 31&t=64759

If you'd like to look at the whole log, it's here: http://www.thelawsplace.com/2016-12-19_10.39.24.msl.zip

[mrx79]

Hi muythaibxr,
thanks for your explanation. Now i understand what you mean.
From my point of view, equal units is not mandatory, my biggest concern with TypeC currently is that P-Term has no consideration of the error. Thats all.

For Windup technicaly you are correct. But again, i would say it's not mandatory from my point of view. Maybe not always 100% correct, but it's the same today.
A seperate I-Limit would be good, but i guess for a first try it would be also ok to use the same auth. limit for the I-Part as for the total controller output.
Of course, this means that P I and D Part are all calculated in percentage to apply the limit properly.

I will read a bit more of Type A, and look forward for any future implementation. ;-)

Thanks for your open mind.