e85 vs 98

Tuning concepts, methods, tips etc.

Moderators: jsmcortina, muythaibxr

Post Reply
mazdaspeed
Helpful MS/Extra'er
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:20 pm

e85 vs 98

Post by mazdaspeed »

Hi im looking for advantages and dis advantages for running e85 fuel and some info on wat afr to tune to and can you generally run more aggresive timing???
elutionsdesign
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:20 pm

Re: e85 vs 98

Post by elutionsdesign »

Advantage, you can make more power. Disadvantage, maybe harder cold starts, difficulty finding fuel depending upon where you are geographically. Big advantage, use a flex fuel sensor, MS2 and 3 processors can accept the input and seamlessly adjust things. Yes you can run more timing, hence more power, but you'll need to find a reputable tuner with a steady state dyno to really map out the ignition timing.

Lambda is lambda regardless of the fuel type, I would suggest tuning to the same lambda values you are using for your current fuel type. Wide band sensors measure lambda and then convert that to your fuel type.
Graduate of EFI University.

I build, repair, install and tune Megasquirt systems in North Dakota and beyond!
mustanglx_1989
Helpful MS/Extra'er
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:12 pm
Location: LaPorte, IN

Re: e85 vs 98

Post by mustanglx_1989 »

I don't want to threadjack, but I'm very interested in this idea.

Would you just add 20% more fuel and leave everything else alone?

If you didn't have the sensor, would it necessary to test each batch or could you just tune it on the safe side and run with it?

Thanks,
James
MS3X V3.00

1989 Mustang 289ci. GT-40 Intake, Pro-Comp aluminum heads, full length headers running through 3" exhaust.
C4 automatic trans with 4:10 gears.
Innovative MTX-L wideband.
elutionsdesign
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 1341
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:20 pm

Re: e85 vs 98

Post by elutionsdesign »

Without the sensor you're constantly retuning the fuel requirement unless you just run straight E85, even then you'd have to retune when they switch to winter blend (E70). The flex fuel sensor makes it so much easier, worth every penny.

No you can't just add 20% everywhere and leave the rest alone.

If you want to use the fuel to make more power you have to take advantage of it either through being able to run more timing OR boost OR both. Just using it as an alternative fuel does not increase power.
Graduate of EFI University.

I build, repair, install and tune Megasquirt systems in North Dakota and beyond!
JAM
Master MS/Extra'er
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: Cincinatti,OH

Re: e85 vs 98

Post by JAM »

this is true, i have a pump next to my place and it can go as low as e70 and there is a tolerance on the e85 so it can go a little higher i believe . if i do it i will mix it to e70 at all times (race application only)
I have one of these but have yet to use it...

http://www.jegs.com/i/Quick+Fuel/793/36-E85/10002/-1

http://www.quickfueltechnology.com/spec ... -tube.html
Raymond_B
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 1398
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:17 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: e85 vs 98

Post by Raymond_B »

Where are you guys mounting the Flex Fuel sensor? Is in the fuel rail preferable? I was just thinking of response time on when the fuel tables and spark start to swap/blend.
1995 Ford Lightning. Dart based 427 Windsor, Novi 2000, full sequential, E-85, etc. MS3X/v3.57
http://www.buildpics.org/
mustanglx_1989
Helpful MS/Extra'er
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:12 pm
Location: LaPorte, IN

Re: e85 vs 98

Post by mustanglx_1989 »

http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/151318067213?lpid=82

Are these the GM ones that are being used?

James
MS3X V3.00

1989 Mustang 289ci. GT-40 Intake, Pro-Comp aluminum heads, full length headers running through 3" exhaust.
C4 automatic trans with 4:10 gears.
Innovative MTX-L wideband.
Post Reply