Critique my timing table

[aw113sgte]

My timing table is what is generated by http://www.useasydocs.com/theory/spktable.htm
I do not have access to a load bearing dyno so I will be doing what I can tuning on the road.
What I am seeing from 1000cc 4 cylinder bikes is total timing about 40 degrees. Since I will be boosting up to 10psi, the common suggestion of 1degree/1psi so that would put my total timing around 30deg, however the calculator spits out 18.6. Thoughts?

My table:

map2d.jpg

My motorcycle specs for table entry:

ign calc.jpg

Table of an R1 (same bore/stroke as my WR250X, similar head design, different cams etc).

09R1ignGear6.jpg

[elutionsdesign]

I'm certainly more in agreement with the MS timing table, a mulitvalve chamber with swirl/tumble (stumble) at that static compression ratio should never need much timing as it is quite a bit more efficient than a two valve pushrod motor. I would start at something in the mid 20's for total timing but I would drop it less than 1 degree per psi boost. Then I would find a constant load dyno.

[grom_e30]

from looking about my self motorbikes do seem to run a hell of a lot of ignition advance.

[dontz125]

This is the curve of an '87 FZR1000; 75 x 56mm, 11.2:1 compression. No TPS and no EXUP, and most of the FZRs were considered to be detuned by about 5* vs what you could run on typical (87) pump gas. With a TPS, you should have no issues adding a LOT of advance at part-throttle operation. Obviously, pulling advance as you boost ...

FZR1000T.jpg

[aw113sgte]

I've updated the timing table and here is what I am running now. Bike runs well, unfortunately without access to a load dyno I am left guessing. I also can't detect pinging/knocking....single cylinder motorcycle.

timing2.jpg