Question regarding fuel ve tables
Moderators: jsmcortina, muythaibxr
-
- Helpful MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:19 pm
- Location: Southeast Kansas, USA
- Contact:
Question regarding fuel ve tables
On an ITB turbo application, would it be advised to setup the fuel ve 2 table axis to kpa and register from 100 kpa - 200 kpa versus 30 kpa - 200 kpa? When I allow the TS to generate the table it sets the axis up form 30 -200 kpa. It would seem to me that even in off boost driving and idling it would be adding fuel. I seem to think that it would be best to use the fuel ve 2 table for adding fuel during boosted situations....any thoughts?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 17507
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:08 pm
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
Most engines are very linear in the boosted range. We typically use about four rows for boost.
Matt Cramer -1966 Dodge Dart slant six running on MS3X
-
- Helpful MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:19 pm
- Location: Southeast Kansas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
Thanks matt...
I have another question regarding the fuel tables, I may be adding more needless complexity to my tune by even running more than on fuel table. Do you advise just running one fuel table to even control fuel above 100 kpa? I have been trying to use 2 tables, the second to control above 100 kpa. It just crossed my mind to simplify it and only run one fuel table in the itb mode for 30 to 200 kpa....
Any thoughts for going that direction?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
I have another question regarding the fuel tables, I may be adding more needless complexity to my tune by even running more than on fuel table. Do you advise just running one fuel table to even control fuel above 100 kpa? I have been trying to use 2 tables, the second to control above 100 kpa. It just crossed my mind to simplify it and only run one fuel table in the itb mode for 30 to 200 kpa....
Any thoughts for going that direction?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
You could use a secondary fuel load set to "Speed Density" and "additive"; the top row of VE1 would be all '0.0' at 100.1kPa, with the second-last row being 100.0kPa. VE2 would start at 100.0kPa with a row of '0.0'; the second row would start at 100.1kPa.
Edit: Corrected "VE3" to "VE2", which is the correct table.
Edit: Corrected "VE3" to "VE2", which is the correct table.
Last edited by dontz125 on Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Temporarily shut down - back soon!
QuadraMAP Sensor Module -- PWM-to-Stepper Controller -- Dual Coil Driver
Coming soon: OctoMAP Sensor Module
TTR Ignition Systems
QuadraMAP Sensor Module -- PWM-to-Stepper Controller -- Dual Coil Driver
Coming soon: OctoMAP Sensor Module
TTR Ignition Systems
-
- Helpful MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:19 pm
- Location: Southeast Kansas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
Do you mean ve2? I know that the ve2 can be set as "speed density" and "additive"....I wasn't aware that the ve3 could be setup that waydontz125 wrote:You could use a secondary fuel load set to "Speed Density" and "additive"; the top row of VE1 would be all '0.0' at 100.1kPa, with the second-last row being 100.0kPa. VE3 would start at 100.0kPa with a row of '0.0'; the second row would start at 100.1kPa.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
You are of course entirely correct; VE2 is for Secondary, VE3 is for Switching. My apologies for any confusion.Moody wrote:Do you mean ve2? I know that the ve2 can be set as "speed density" and "additive"....I wasn't aware that the ve3 could be setup that way
Temporarily shut down - back soon!
QuadraMAP Sensor Module -- PWM-to-Stepper Controller -- Dual Coil Driver
Coming soon: OctoMAP Sensor Module
TTR Ignition Systems
QuadraMAP Sensor Module -- PWM-to-Stepper Controller -- Dual Coil Driver
Coming soon: OctoMAP Sensor Module
TTR Ignition Systems
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 17507
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:08 pm
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
It's very rare to require table switching between vacuum and boost. There are some people who do this but usually it's way overkill.
Matt Cramer -1966 Dodge Dart slant six running on MS3X
-
- Helpful MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:19 pm
- Location: Southeast Kansas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
just going back and researching some more and I found this thread I started awhile back....I think Im going to run in ITB mode and tune that with the charge tube off the best that I can, then I will set up a secondary fueling in SD from 100 kpa to 200 kpa for fueling will boosting.
My question now is, would it best to set the secondary fueling table to "additive" or "multiply"?
I think it might be simplest to "multiply" the secondary fueling because as matt said the boost fueling should be fairly linear...any thoughts?
My question now is, would it best to set the secondary fueling table to "additive" or "multiply"?
I think it might be simplest to "multiply" the secondary fueling because as matt said the boost fueling should be fairly linear...any thoughts?
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 2221
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:20 pm
- Location: St Louis
- Contact:
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
Start with plain old speed density with about 4 rows for boost. Once you start collecting data, and the motor starts developing a fueling pattern, we can look at the data and figure out if we need to make it more complicated. Most likely your turbo motor will dial right in with speed density.
-
- Helpful MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:19 pm
- Location: Southeast Kansas, USA
- Contact:
Re: Question regarding fuel ve tables
This is a 4 cylinder 1052 cc short stroke motorcycle engine, the vacuum signal is very weak at 10" HG at the highest vacuum and that vacuum goes away quickly with little throttle input. I think that's kinda the reason they developed the ITB mode, and the way I understand it that's the way modern oem sport bikes are tuned as well. I have read all of your posts regarding ITB tuning and I do understand your reasoning, but on my engine it would be easier to setup a decent AN tune then add the SD later as secondary.whittlebeast wrote:Start with plain old speed density with about 4 rows for boost. Once you start collecting data, and the motor starts developing a fueling pattern, we can look at the data and figure out if we need to make it more complicated. Most likely your turbo motor will dial right in with speed density.
I already have the ITB mode with the switching points laid out and it seems to be happy, but tuning with boost I was thinking it might be more consistent to have a secondary table for pressures above ambient pressure, because when boost comes on can vary with rpm and load...
It seems to me that the ITB mode is the exact same thing that you did on your ITB tuning tread, it's just you did it on your own starting with SD
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk