switching the AFR table to lamda
Moderators: jsmcortina, muythaibxr
switching the AFR table to lamda
Can you switch the afr table on tuner studio to lamda vs. The gas scale
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 6828
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:41 am
- Location: Walnut Creek, Calif. USA
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
I'm sure you can, but don't know the procedure. I'll take a peek at my tune in TS... and the manuals.
Edit: do it in TS "project properties", "settings". Change "oxygen sensor/display" from AFR to lambda.
Edit: do it in TS "project properties", "settings". Change "oxygen sensor/display" from AFR to lambda.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
ok i found it. thanks. one other question im trying to run methanol and alot are saying start at .55 lambda. i have a innovative lc2 and i don't think it will go that low. any input on this one.
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 6828
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:41 am
- Location: Walnut Creek, Calif. USA
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
I think .55 would be really rich. My understanding is that all fuels will show a lambda = 1 when at their stoic AFR. So, methanol at a stoic of 9 for AFR would be lamda = 1, and .55 would mean the AFR was about 5. Am I correct, folks? Maybe you have to start that rich (or richer) to get the engine running. I have been doing some experiments with (wet) ethanol and find that it needs to be very rich to fire off, and the fuel needs to be heated; vaporization is that poor.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Yes I ran e85 last year. It takes a lot more fuel during start up.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Im a little confused now about afr's and methanol. A guy that tunes a lot of of the turbo cars at the track and most are running methanol says lambda need to be .55. Here is what he said.
Lambda would work. Start around .55 lambda. 5.22:1 would be 12:1 on gas scale(which is way to lean). I idle a methanol engine around 4.2:1.7.5:1 would be just over 3.2:1 using gas scale.
Lambda would work. Start around .55 lambda. 5.22:1 would be 12:1 on gas scale(which is way to lean). I idle a methanol engine around 4.2:1.7.5:1 would be just over 3.2:1 using gas scale.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
I guess the question now is can you re scale your wide band O2 to read methanol.?
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 6828
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:41 am
- Location: Walnut Creek, Calif. USA
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Do you mean for TS and what is logged, or a "real" dash gauge driven from the WB controller? I think a custom data-field could be created for TS displays, but the dash gauge possibility would depend on the WB controller. I sure won't know, but post the brand and P/N of the WB and maybe somebody else can advise.
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:20 pm
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
They all read Lambda and re-scale to the fuel in use but it's probably best just to leave it as lambda or it gets confusing fast. The LC2 can be programmed for any output range and it is capable of lambda 0.5-1.5.
Graduate of EFI University.
I build, repair, install and tune Megasquirt systems in North Dakota and beyond!
I build, repair, install and tune Megasquirt systems in North Dakota and beyond!
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 6828
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:41 am
- Location: Walnut Creek, Calif. USA
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Oops, I forgot he said it is an LC2. I think the desire is for an AFR display that is correct for methanol.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
I talked to Innovative Motorsports and the tech guy said that I'm not going to be able to use my O2 sensor because the AFR is going to be below 8.0 AFR and it will foul out the sensor because keeping the egt's below 1100 degrees I'm going to have to tune below 8.0 AFR.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Like the tuneing guy said you need to get the lambda down to .55 to keep the egt's down below 1100 degrees Fahrenheit only in the top end of the track.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Any one have any good solution. Is there a auto tune or a run analysis I can use the will work with egt's instead of afr's?
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 6828
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:41 am
- Location: Walnut Creek, Calif. USA
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Alas, I think you got some very bogus info from the Innovative "tech" guy! Or, there is a communication problem. The WB sensor and controller should not be damaged, and should pass a usable signal to MS; but the conversion the controller/gauge system makes and displays may only be proper for 14.7:1 gasoline.
I hope Jean B. or somebody else will join in here to explain better (or get me straightened out!). I'm trying to help, but not any kind of expert.
I hope Jean B. or somebody else will join in here to explain better (or get me straightened out!). I'm trying to help, but not any kind of expert.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Jean is a smart man. I appreciate your help. Well I know I did not damage it because I never went richer than 10 AFR.
-
- Master MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:31 am
- Location: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
according the users manual for my lc-1 and my dlg-1 innovate wide band sensors, you can program which fuel you are using and then the lamda reading of 1 will be whatever the stoichiometric ratio for that fuel is. gasoline 14.7, propane 15.5, ethanol 9, methanol 6.4...... etc.
64 el camino, 383 SBC, 11.7 to1 CR, accufab tb/rhs intake, 44lb injectors, trick flow heads, xr292r solid roller cam, belt drive camshaft, dry sump oil system, 2400 stall, turbo 350, spooled 9 inch, strange axles, 3.89 gears, dual wideband, full sequential fuel/cop, MS3x using 1.4.1 code.
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Scott Clark set me straight about the AFR on methanol. He said to target about 8.0 on the gas scale in which he also said the LC 2 will go that low
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
One thing that puzzles me though is if the AFR 4 gasoline engine is happy at say 12 to 1 stoichiometric foremost boosted Motors and methanol needs 8.0 AFR on the gasoline scale why does it need so much more I guess I'm just a little confused and I realize that methanol you need so much more. I know when I was running E85 I was shooting for 11.5 AFR to 11 AFR at full Boost on the gasoline scale.
-
- Super MS/Extra'er
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:20 pm
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
Which is why you should just use lambda and avoid gasoline scale, E85 scale and methanol scale. Lambda is lambda, everything else is a translation function. .8 lambda for gas is .8 lambda for methanol is .8 lambda for E20 is .8 lambda for E85, think in lambda and don't concern yourself with fuel type.
Graduate of EFI University.
I build, repair, install and tune Megasquirt systems in North Dakota and beyond!
I build, repair, install and tune Megasquirt systems in North Dakota and beyond!
Re: switching the AFR table to lamda
So I went to the track on Friday and Saturday and it seems to me like the car likes to idle around 10.5 AFR and the egts are around 1100 degrees with the AFR@ 9.5 by 145 kpa.Of this is running methanol on the gas scale.