ASE does not affect to PW?

teg · Post by **teg** » Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:55 pm

Hi!

If I correclty interpret following log, ASE doesn't affect to PW. Gwarm is up to 200% but PW is same as in ~140%.

Using Beta9

MSQ: http://www.diodi.net/files/ms2/megasqui ... 191736.msq

Post by **muythaibxr** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:28 am

Gwarm is warmup enrichment, not ASE.

Are you running closed-loop or something?

I've actually seen ASE and WUE work on beta-9, not to mention, I think a lot of peoples' cars would not run without it.

Ken

teg · Post by **teg** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:26 am

Nope, I'm not running in closed-loop. Why does WUE act like that? And why it doesn't affect to PW?

Post by **jsmcortina** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:49 am

Could you post the full datalog please. I need to see the idle pulsewidth once Gwarm is down to 100%.

James

teg · Post by **teg** » Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:07 am

Hmm. Maybe PW is correct, later in that log (near 115%) PW is 2,5ms?

I thought that Gwarm includes ASE when it acts like that...

Log: http://www.diodi.net/files/ms2/datalog2 ... dstart.xls