I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

A general forum and a place for initial or prospective users. See Manuals/Documentation
Click here to enter
Contact a Forum Administrator
If unsure where to post, post in this sub-forum.

Moderators: jsmcortina, muythaibxr

Post Reply
jesdude
MS/Extra Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:59 am

I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by jesdude »

Hello everyone,
Thanks for taking the time to read this and I appreciate any advice that is given. I am excited to learn and apply what I have learned to my projects!
I have been looking into Megasquirt products for over a year now but have yet to purchase anything for my project. I have a 1953 Chevy club coupe and I will be installing a chevy 292 inline six cylinder engine and either a 700-r4 or a 4l60e transmission. I believe I am leaning toward the 4l60e because it would get rid of the TV cable that the 700r4 uses and keep the engine bay as clean as possible and reduce the number of cables and brackets hanging off my intake. My engine has siamese intake runners and so I know that I want to start with adapting a GM tbi injection to my intake and use the stock type injectors that it comes with. I may install individual injector for each of the 3 intake runners someday but not for a long time if ever. I also have a stock distributor that has a Pertronix conversion kit installed. I will probably try to run the car's stock gauges at first but add auxiliary gauges as needed that can be hidden somewhere until they are needed. From what I have read so far, It seems to me that the ms3 with the v3.57 would be the best fit for me and allow the easiest expansion in the future and be easily hooked up to my modern laptop and android tablet if needed. I thought I would like to build the board myself at one point but I have changed my mind on that in hopes that I reduce any problem later down the road. What do you guys think?
Matt Cramer
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 17507
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:08 pm

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by Matt Cramer »

An MS3 would be overkill for a fuel only TBI install, but it would be the best bet if you're planning on sequential injection or other high end features down the road.

The transmission will require a separate box - either a GPIO board, or a MicroSquirt running James's transmission control code.
Matt Cramer -1966 Dodge Dart slant six running on MS3X
jesdude
MS/Extra Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:59 am

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by jesdude »

I didn't know about the microsquirt trans controller code but that would be a neat option. About how much would that cost?

I do have a general idea of upgrades in the future that I would want the MS3 to handle and semi-sequential injection and seq spark would be part of the plan eventually. The sdcard logging feature also would be nice.
dontz125
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 4221
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 7:14 pm
Location: York, ON
Contact:

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by dontz125 »

Matt and the gang at DIYAutotune sell the uS plus a short pigtail for $339. James' transmission code itself is free to download and install.
Temporarily shut down - back soon!
QuadraMAP Sensor Module -- PWM-to-Stepper Controller -- Dual Coil Driver
Coming soon: OctoMAP Sensor Module
TTR Ignition Systems
jesdude
MS/Extra Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:59 am

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by jesdude »

That's not a bad price at all. Do you hook it up to the same signal wires as the MS3? Can you give me a link to james' code?
billr
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 6828
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Walnut Creek, Calif. USA

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by billr »

If you are confident about your soldering skills, I encourage you to think again about building a (V3.0) board yourself. With its through-hole design it will be easier to repair or modify in the future, less problems. Also, my understanding from past threads here is that the V3.57 uses a slightly different "tach in" circuit, and it seems to be more fussy than the one on the V3.0 board.
jesdude
MS/Extra Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:59 am

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by jesdude »

I have soldered quite a few things like automotive harnesses and small circuit board repairs but I have never tackled anything that was like the v3.0 board. Hmmm.....I do want the least fussy option though. I would probably have to buy a better soldering iron as I have just used the $30 home depot iron over the years. It would be nice to have an adjustable unit. You have to use the rosin core solder on this, right? If the v3.0 is the heavier duty/less fussy/cheaper option then I could still consider it. How long would it take to complete?
Matt Cramer
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 17507
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:08 pm

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by Matt Cramer »

billr wrote:If you are confident about your soldering skills, I encourage you to think again about building a (V3.0) board yourself. With its through-hole design it will be easier to repair or modify in the future, less problems. Also, my understanding from past threads here is that the V3.57 uses a slightly different "tach in" circuit, and it seems to be more fussy than the one on the V3.0 board.
The only difference is that the resistor on the V3.0 is a slightly higher value for more noise reduction. You can get the same effect on a V3.57 board by putting a 10K resistor inline with the sensor.
Matt Cramer -1966 Dodge Dart slant six running on MS3X
dontz125
Super MS/Extra'er
Posts: 4221
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 7:14 pm
Location: York, ON
Contact:

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by dontz125 »

jesdude wrote:That's not a bad price at all. Do you hook it up to the same signal wires as the MS3? Can you give me a link to james' code?
Transmission controller section in the manual.
Temporarily shut down - back soon!
QuadraMAP Sensor Module -- PWM-to-Stepper Controller -- Dual Coil Driver
Coming soon: OctoMAP Sensor Module
TTR Ignition Systems
jesdude
MS/Extra Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:59 am

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by jesdude »

Okay, thank you guys.
I looked at the transmission pages and that would be great but I can tell i have a lot to learn about all the software and all the options there are!
My engine is currently on a stand that I built and I plan to get it running with MS and then transfer it into the car when it's ready. It will have a radiator, electric fans, alternator, etc. all mounted and ready before i ever fire it up. OH and I know I will be buying the innovate wideband as well to make tuning easier.
jesdude
MS/Extra Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:59 am

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292 TBI

Post by jesdude »

I was looking around DIYautotune.com and saw this http://www.diyautotune.com/catalog/diyb ... p-424.html.
My daily driver 87 gmc truck uses the popular 1227747 ECU and it no longer has to pass emissions standards here in Houston, tx or anywhere for that matter. This has me wondering if I would gain any extra level of performance and/or drivability if I converted the truck over to Megasquirt. The truck runs OK and gets me around but I know for a fact that it's not performing like it should because of the factory setup limits. I've had it for 8 years and it just now has about 130,000 miles on it and still starts up great every time and everything works (except cruise control) but it really lacks acceleration compared to what it used to do AND sometimes will die on me when I have the a/c on and come to a stop or shift into reverse. It has nice new fuel pumps, distributor, sensors, etc. I won't get into how I have diagnosed and fixed the issues in the past because I already know what's causing the engine to die and it is something dumb, but I sometimes think it would be better if I could change parameters on the ECU myself in order to keep it running it's best rather than relying on the factory tables that are designed for fuel economy and emissions standards and the slower response to sensor inputs. I also would like the ability to see all the information that I can't with the factory ecu. Am I wrong to think about doing this? Would I most likely gain what I seek?
Steven
Helpful MS/Extra'er
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:59 am
Location: MN

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by Steven »

how is the 292 coming along? i've just completed a 250 with cop and port injection. it would be helpful to compare set-up notes... Regards Steven
jesdude
MS/Extra Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:59 am

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by jesdude »

Well i'm not sure how to post pictures on here or I would show you but the engine is on a stand at the moment awaiting pushrods. I haven't ordered any of my MS stuff just yet because i'm in the middle of moving and once I get settled in a couple weeks then I can get started on it again. I plan to use the MS3 with a gm tbi on an adapter plate for my offenhauser manifold and then use the stock distributor with a pertronix conversion kit. If anything, I'll need your help since you're already familiar with everything! So since you did COP then did you mount a trigger wheel to your harmonic balancer? Is there a way for you to send pictures of your setup?
Steven
Helpful MS/Extra'er
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:59 am
Location: MN

Re: I'm a newbie, planning a MS chevy 292

Post by Steven »

Dude
I'll start a new thread later and post some pics there, then it will help anyone with a gm straight six.
Steve
Post Reply