piledriver wrote:same issue after fattening up ve map and reshuffling the rpm columns, new issue with this FW
pit_celica wrote:It seems to coincide when MAPdot oscillation are greater than MAPdot enrichment. I know the symptom is a PW enleanment, but I think you should try to remove the MAP accel and TP accel by setting mapdot and tpsdot treshold at a very high value. At least, it will remove the accel variable.
It's interesting how the MAP signal is getting more noisy from 4000 to 5500 RPM. This noise is more hard from 5200 to 5500. The best way to look at it is looking MAPdot in the log. It's pretty interesting.
piledriver wrote:Thanks for the quick read on this, pulls to 7k clean and fat with the threshholds raised.
I actually turned the thresholds up to 300 and it's gone, card drives much better too.
I drives strangely well for having accell amost turnrd off, do have eae on.
I haven't jacked with the accell much sice the code change, I was dealing with 30-35kpa swings through the rpm range (happy intake manifold/good tri-y header, and fixed sample angle on ms2)
It's so much more stable and easy to tune with the new code I'm very disinclined to switch back, I just need to redo parts of my setup. I'll be loading your new pass at it tomorrow now that I know this is just a loose nut behind the wheel, not a fw issue.
The new sampling code/filters may make setting up accell again easier.
nitrousdave wrote:Is there a certain version of tunerstudio to use with use? I tried the latest release and beta version (of tunerstudio) and tunerstudio will continuously go online/offline and not stay connected.
nitrousdave wrote:Just seems weird that 3.2.1 works just fine with standard settings, but I'll have to give it a try.
nitrousdave wrote:I tried evey different rate tonight and none of them worked. You don't have to close TS and reopen it each time you change the rate do you?
; MAP sampling time?
Users browsing this forum: WestfieldMX5 and 0 guests