Moderators: daxtojeiro, muythaibxr, jsmcortina, MegaScott


racingmini_mtl wrote:Scott,
I'll see what I can do. I want to keep the board simple and don't want any feature creep but if I can make the board interesting for a wider audience and keep the same footprint then that's fine. The ADC circuit is just a few components and they don't have to be populated if not needed.
Jean

racingmini_mtl wrote:This is what I've come up with:
In addition to adding 2 more ADC circuits, I have added 4 holes in case the board is not to be mounted in a slot of the MS case. Also, one or two holes can be used to secure the board in place when it is mounted in the last slot of the case.
However, I won't be able to get it done if I only have a couple of interested persons. If I can get interest for 5 boards, then I'll go ahead. And I'm using Eagle to design the boards.
Cheers,
Jean
Peter Florance wrote:I used this circuit, but grounded pin 14 to use it in zero crossing mode.
You might provide instructions to bridge (or replace with jumper) the capacitor that is tied to pin 14 if users want to use it that way.
Also do you have plenty of power supply bypass capacitor? The datasheet calls for it, especially if the IC is required to clamp large VR signals.
HTH
Peter

racingmini_mtl wrote:This is what I've come up with:
In addition to adding 2 more ADC circuits, I have added 4 holes in case the board is not to be mounted in a slot of the MS case. Also, one or two holes can be used to secure the board in place when it is mounted in the last slot of the case.
However, I won't be able to get it done if I only have a couple of interested persons. If I can get interest for 5 boards, then I'll go ahead. And I'm using Eagle to design the boards.
Cheers,
Jean
racingmini_mtl wrote:Peter Florance wrote:I used this circuit, but grounded pin 14 to use it in zero crossing mode.
You might provide instructions to bridge (or replace with jumper) the capacitor that is tied to pin 14 if users want to use it that way.
Also do you have plenty of power supply bypass capacitor? The datasheet calls for it, especially if the IC is required to clamp large VR signals.
HTH
Peter
Peter,
I used this circuit as the basis for the board (2 of them):
So there is one power supply bypass capacitor for each LM1815N and according to the schematic above it should be 0.1uF and they correspond to C3 and C7 on my board. The datasheet is very generic in what is required and I'm not familiar with the typical VR sensor signal range. What did you use for your bypass capacitor and do you think 0.1uF is ok?
And thank you for the suggestion for the zero crossing mode.
Cheers,
Jean


Peter Florance wrote:I used this circuit, but grounded pin 14 to use it in zero crossing mode. You might provide instructions to bridge (or replace with jumper) the capacitor that is tied to pin 14 if users want to use it that way
newtyres1 wrote:Peter Florance wrote:I used this circuit, but grounded pin 14 to use it in zero crossing mode. You might provide instructions to bridge (or replace with jumper) the capacitor that is tied to pin 14 if users want to use it that way
Peter,
Are there some advantages in using it in this mode?
Ian.
newtyres1 wrote:Thanks for that Peter, I wasn't aware of that mode, I think the datasheet expects you to know that that is how it can operate, or maybe I didn't study it enough to fully understand.
Jean, just a suggestion for your board, would it be worth having the 2 LM1815 ccts completely seperate on the PCB so a user could saw the board in half if required, with 1 x LM on one piece and the other LM and ADC inputs on the other? For myself, who only needed one LM1815, I could cut the board up and bolt the one LM cct to the lid and use up minimal space, and have a spare LM1815 board for another project or a friend in need. Just adding versatility, just a thought...I see you are running out of room and designing takes a long time though. Oh yeah, thanks for designing the board in the first place, and I hope a few home brew veroboard LM1815 ccts get updated to your board for the sake of reliability at least.
Ian.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests